It seems to be fixed now...thanks for whatever you did.
52 2011-01-19 06:57:22
Onderwerp: Armour error (1 reacties, geschreven in Bug archive)
This is weird. I am not sure how to explain it correctly...I have armour, I lent some said armour to a clanmate, he later returned what was left to me.
Upon going to redress my troops, I noted the window said they were already dressed. They couldn't be. I just got the armour back...I did a few clicks here and there. Same thing.
To make a long story short, my available armour to use is 3x what it should be *IF* my troops are dressed. I am not showing extra...I am showing what it says I would have if my guys were naked. But they are not, they are showing dressed.
You are welcome to go into my account (Daed) and have a look. It's quite odd.
Thanks.
ETA: I sent an ingame pm with a copy of what my equipment says while my guys are fully dressed.
53 2011-01-18 00:18:07
Re: Proposal for units (83 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
I am just asking why gual's attack values went down, yet their cost to train/maintain went up. There is no need to get nasty.
54 2011-01-18 00:09:38
Re: Proposal for units (83 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
Demonic...you JUST wrote that not more than an hour or two ago...
Demonic Today 14:42:36
*
* Winner of Speed v1
* Offline
* From: -452,675
* Registered: 2009-11-16
* Posts: 505
* IP: 77.167.141.200
Nope, don't think so...
Gual will be more expensive and more powerfull.
But the speed comes at a price as well.
55 2011-01-17 23:34:31
Re: Proposal for units (83 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
Demonic schreef:
Gual will be more expensive and more powerfull
So again, you are wrong here. Expensive yes, more powerful no.
I fail to see the rationale of having such a medicocre unit have such an insane cost.
56 2011-01-17 23:07:29
Re: Proposal for units (83 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
...but that is what I am saying, their worth and overall attack values went way DOWN, yet their costs to train/maintain went way UP. This does not make sense.
ETA: so why would anyone use them? Just their speed? Even if the speed is 50, they're still useless since their attack is too low. And when mixed with other units, their speed doesn't count anymore, so again... why bother to train them? You basically cancelled out this unit.
57 2011-01-17 22:00:49
Re: Proposal for units (83 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
I looked at the latest stats, they went down alot overall....yet are uber expensive.
58 2011-01-17 17:54:01
Re: Proposal for units (83 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
So, correct me if I am wrong....gual will be one of the weaker units now, yet cost the most?
59 2011-01-17 05:56:41
Re: New stats to stable 2? (10 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
I voted no, but only temporarily, to give folks a chance to up their food before their troops die a slow, painful death from starvation.
Maybe a weeks notice?
60 2011-01-15 17:39:23
Re: Clan size limit error (2 reacties, geschreven in Bug archive)
Sorry, stable II
61 2011-01-15 09:45:17
Onderwerp: Clan size limit error (2 reacties, geschreven in Bug archive)
We have 19 in the clan, however anyone that tries to join gets a message stating the clan is full. Thanks.
62 2010-12-29 02:28:19
Re: TOTAL BULL S*** (16 reacties, geschreven in Bug archive)
Thanks wham 
Sorry, jla...that is crappy.
63 2010-12-28 00:05:25
Re: TOTAL BULL S*** (16 reacties, geschreven in Bug archive)
Yeah but the test server is still in test mode with different stats, is it not? These should be speed stats for battles still.
ETA: I am not dismissing the current battle system is not extremely flawed, but I honestly do not see how this is a luck factor thing in *this* case....
also, I think luck is a factor when both sides are fairly equal in numbers, not always in small troop counts.
64 2010-12-27 21:48:09
Re: TOTAL BULL S*** (16 reacties, geschreven in Bug archive)
It is my understanding the "luck factor" is only when troop counts are close. This is clearly not the case here.
Can someone please look at this and post an answer? Thanks.
65 2010-12-17 22:46:27
Re: Weapon Costs (33 reacties, geschreven in Feedback)
Jerico schreef:
Rune searches are just down right cheaper compared to retraining, reequiping soldiers and MAYBE getting runes.
I agree with jerico. Gual take 1hr 30, FullPlate is 1hr 40min each...not to mention the cr*pload of iron needed. It is NOT cost effective to lose troops in a battle system that is broken right now.
How about the gems fixed, so you can actually *use* some of the spells needed to attack, without having to wait 3.5 weeks to accumulate...
Yes, that was an exaggeration, but you get my point.
66 2010-12-08 04:12:03
Re: Christmas (5 reacties, geschreven in Questions)
I loved the Christmas Trees last time!!
67 2010-12-08 00:10:27
Re: New rules on international II (37 reacties, geschreven in Game rules)
Demonic schreef:
We haven't seen the effects that occured on speed 1 and 2 on the new server.
Uhm, speed 1 was virtually perfect without any cheating that the mods could detect using the tools in which they had.
You won that server.
Did you cheat to get there? 
68 2010-12-07 13:44:21
Re: Spells (6 reacties, geschreven in Questions)
Spell cast costs increase as your village size increases.
69 2010-12-06 06:15:03
Re: Long bans for speaking in chat (59 reacties, geschreven in General chat)
Yes V, we all know how much you loved us.
70 2010-12-05 06:23:32
Re: Account Reset (85 reacties, geschreven in Announcements)
Yan schreef:
International II is the most balanced game Dolumar has seen so far, but I guess that is a coincidence.
That's not true
71 2010-12-05 00:48:28
Re: Mobile device + dolumar (24 reacties, geschreven in General chat)
My son and frodo could load dolumar on their itouch/iphone, but I do not believe it would load properly...
I can't on my blackberry.
Bad_dude may have a phone that can, I will ask him again.
72 2010-12-05 00:45:05
Re: Account Reset (85 reacties, geschreven in Announcements)
Vizy, I am sorry to hear that. 
We trusted you.
73 2010-12-04 00:58:32
Re: Account Reset (85 reacties, geschreven in Announcements)
I said WOOT in main chat cause I put you on ignore. You banned me for 24 hours after that. Nice.
74 2010-12-04 00:42:43
Re: Account Reset (85 reacties, geschreven in Announcements)
and i have now been banned for 24 hours, cause i put demo on ignore.
75 2010-12-04 00:30:12
Re: Account Reset (85 reacties, geschreven in Announcements)
Yes demo, and it was a private message when you banned me.
Pming someone for the intention of banning them for their answer, is jerk-ish. Period.